Mystery Of Iniquity

On Friday, July 22nd, a man executed a plan he apparently hatched some years ago and exploded a car bomb in the city center of Oslo, Norway. He then proceeded to a political organization's youth camp of the leftwing Labor Party of Norway, and murdered nearly 85 teenagers in one terrifying orgasm of violence not seen in Scandinavia since World War II. Anders Behring Breivik was the man the police managed to capture after his murderous rampage on the youth camp island of Utoya.

This tragic story unfortunately has been used by the leftwing media to paint a picture of a "right-wing" zealot with a crazed ambition to rid Europe of Moslems and Marxists beginning with a murderous attack on what he considered to be "traitors" in his midst. The moment this story broke I felt it was either a Moslem attack or a Leftwing attack in Norway. In no way could a "conservative" or "rightwinger" even concieve of carrying out a task this heinous and evil and still call himself a "freedom fighter". Yet, since Friday, the media have instantly jumped on the bandwagon after pushing it along and to paint the attack as a "blue eyed, blond haired, christian fundamentalist, conservative, rightwinger" who went haywire against his own country's liberal policies and lashed out the way he did. Naturally, the media, lectured us on how "to not jump to conclusions" about it being a "moslem attack" as if there is no precedence to come to such a conclusion.

The media have also told us that he wrote a manifesto of sorts (typical leftwinger/moslem) about what he was about to do and the reasons for it. Somehow they have managed to call him a "christian fundamentalist" when he himself says in the manifesto that he is not! World Net Daily has examined the manifesto more closely and clearly shows a man who does not believe in Christ and says so quite explicitly:

"Being a Christian can mean many things; That you believe in and want to protect Europe's Christian cultural heritage. The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity – Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reason is the primary source and legitimacy for authority). It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a 'Christian fundamentalist theocracy' (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want). So no, you don't need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)). The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation [sic] but rather a Christian 'culturalist' military order."

I'm not sure how the leftwing media could possibly overlook this glaring admission by the Murderer of Utoya other than they are willfully clouding the waters to cover this man's clearly anti-Christian and anti-conservative acts. He clearly has not bowed his knee to Jesus Christ by his very own admission. Furthermore, this man obviously didn't mind a socialist Europe and socialist country because he apparently doesn't rail against socialism or collectivists policies which seems odd to me if he is a "conservative" or "rightwinger". I understand in Europe that being on the right has been so demonized by the Left that it is used as a pejorative to mean that you are a NAZI if you are "rightwing". Of course, if you know anything about the NAZIs or Fascists then you understand that these two systems of socialist/collectivist governance belongs on the leftward scale of politics. Anything construed by the Left as "nationalistic" is considered NAZI or Fascist which is unfortunate because the greatest communist of all, Joseph Stalin, was a nationalist when it suited the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in the early 1920's and in World War II.

I actually think this man may have actually sought something far greater than merely to engender a "rightwing" revolt against a multicultural Europe. It is interesting to note what he says in his manifesto regarding the Protestant Churches in Europe:

"I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed..."We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had an important role once, but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead [sic] by a just and non-suicidal pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities." Italicized are mine.

What's interesting about his comment here is the very real erosion of the Protestant Churches in Europe and the future rise of an ecumenical religion that rises along with a future 10 Nation Confederation as outlined in the Book of Daniel and in the Book of Revelation. I believe the Catholic Church will someday be that religion that absorbs all of the other western religions (Protestant, Orthodox, Agnostic, Evolution) and rides a new political order in Europe to power. Per the book of Revelation this religious and political act of convenience ultimately destroys both the ecumenical religion in Europe and the 10 Nation Confederation paving the way for the worship of the Anti-Christ and the rise of the Fourth World Power with the Anti-Christ as its titular head per the book of Daniel.

Can we not agree that Anders Brievik's murderous rampage was so evil that it will go down as one of history's most notorious crimes? Is Anders acts of murder thus inspired not by "nationalistic, conservative, rightwing" notions of sovereignty and rule but the desire to please his master and usher in the Anti-Christ in his bloody sacrifice to his god, once the arch-angel over God's throne, Satan the Devil? Doesn't the murder of the young hearken back to man's darkest days when Satanic religious systems ruled the day in Europe before the advent and light of Christianity dispelled these evil systems of thought and works? Did Ander's perform this act knowing that he is "contributing" to bringing about the "Coming Man" of Sin?

"As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science, and it must always continue to be that way. Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I'm not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe."

Clearly, a "Christian Fundamentalist" would never allow science to take precedence over Bible Doctrine. Let it be known that his man will be judged by Jesus Christ at the Great White Throne and when his name is not found in the "registry of the righteous" also known as the Book of Life then he will spend eternity with his god in the Lake of Fire.